Comparative analysis of surgical treatment modalities for a popliteal pterygium: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Popliteal pterygium syndrome is a rare congenital disorder characterized by orofacial, cutaneous, musculoskeletal, and genital anomalies. The popliteal pterygium (PP) affects ambulation due to severe knee flexion contracture and equinovarus deformities. Surgical treatment aims to correct these deformities while preserving limb sensibility. However, due to its rarity, surgical guidelines are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted to summarize and compare surgical methods for PP. 183 paper were identified in PubMed and data from 32 articles were analyzed, including patient demographics, treatment modalities (Ilizarov fixator, femoral osteotomy, skin/soft tissue procedures, hamstring release, nerve surgery, and amputation), pre- and post-operative abilities to walk, knee joint parameters, complications, and recurrent contractions. RESULTS: Among 58 patients (87 limbs), Ilizarov fixator demonstrated improved knee and ankle mobility postoperatively, but showed a relatively high surgical session count and complication rates. Femoral osteotomy achieved successful knee posture correction with fewer sessions and no complications. Isolated skin/soft tissue procedures improved flexion contracture and mobility, though they required several procedures. Hamstring release achieved notable contracture reduction but also necessitated multiple interventions. Nerve surgery and amputation had limited data, warranting further investigation. CONCLUSION: The management of PP demands a comprehensive approach, considering individual patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. While different surgical modalities offer distinct benefits, a classification or guideline to treat this deformity is still lacking. Further research is essential to validate findings, refine treatment approaches, and enhance the quality of life for individuals with PP.

Mechanisms, interventions at risk and clinical presentation of iatrogenic nerve lesions in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic nerve lesions during surgical interventions are avoidable complications that may cause severe functional impairment. Hereby, awareness of physicians and knowledge of structures and interventions at risk is of utmost importance for prevention. As current literature is scarce, we evaluated all patients treated surgically due to peripheral nerve injuries in our specialized nerve center for the presence of iatrogenic nerve lesions. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 5026 patients with peripheral nerve injuries treated over a time period of 8 years in our facility for the prevalence of iatrogenic nerve injuries, their clinical presentations, time to treatment, mechanisms and intraoperative findings on nerve continuity. RESULTS: A total of 360 (6.1%) patients had an iatrogenic cause resulting in 380 injured nerves. 76.6% of these lesions affected the main branch of the injured nerve, which were mainly the radial (30.5%), peroneal (13.7%) and median nerve (10.3%). After a mean delay of 237 ± 344 days, patients presented 23.2% with a motor and 27.9% with a mixed sensory and motor deficit. 72.6% of lesions were in-continuity lesions. Main interventions at risk are displayed for every nerve, frequently concerning osteosyntheses but also patient positioning and anesthesiologic interventions. DISCUSSION: Awareness of major surgical complications such as iatrogenic nerve injuries is important for surgeons. An often-seen trivialization or "watch and wait" strategy results in a huge delay for starting an adequate therapy. The high number of in-continuity lesions mainly in close proximity to osteosyntheses makes diagnosis and treatment planning a delicate challenge, especially due to the varying clinical presentations we found. Diagnostics and therapy should therefore be performed as early as possible in specialized centers capable of performing nerve repair as well as salvage therapies.

The Surgical Restoration of Arm and Hand Function in Tetraplegic Patients.

BACKGROUND: There are approximately 140 000 people in Germany with spinal cord injury, with approximately 2400 new patients each year. Cervical spinal cord injuries cause, to varying degrees, weakness and impairment of everyday activities of the limbs (tetraparesis, tetraplegia). METHODS: This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature. RESULTS: From among 330 initially screened publications, 40 were included and analyzed. Muscle and tendon transfers, tenodeses, and joint stabilizations yielded reliable functional improvement of the upper limb. Tendon transfers improved the strength of elbow extension from M0 to an average of M3.3 (BMRC) and grip strength to approximately 2 kg. In the long term, 17-20% of strength is lost after active tendon transfers and slightly more after passive ones. Nerve transfers improved strength to M3 or M4 in over 80% of cases, with the best results overall in patients under 25 years of age who underwent early surgery (within 6 months of the accident). Combined procedures in a single operation have been found to be advantageous compared to the traditional multistep approach. Nerve transfers from intact fascicles at segmental levels above that of the spinal cord lesion have been found to be a valuable addition to the established varieties of muscle and tendon transfer. The reported long-term patient satisfaction is generally high. CONCLUSION: Modern techniques of hand surgery can help suitably selected tetraparetic and tetraplegic patients regain the use of their upper limbs. Competent interdisciplinary counseling about these surgical options should be offered as early as possible to all affected persons as an integral part of their treatment plan.

Effect of Surgical Release of Entrapped Peripheral Nerves in Sensorimotor Diabetic Neuropathy on Pain and Sensory Dysfunction-Study Protocol of a Prospective, Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Nerve entrapment has been hypothesized to contribute to the multicausal etiology of axonopathy in sensorimotor diabetic neuropathy. Targeted surgical decompression reduces external strain on the affected nerve and, therefore, may alleviate symptoms, including pain and sensory dysfunction. However, its therapeutic value in this cohort remains unclear. AIM: Quantifying the treatment effect of targeted lower extremity nerve decompression in patients with preexisting painful sensorimotor diabetic neuropathy and nerve entrapment on pain intensity, sensory function, motor function, and neural signal conduction. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, controlled trial studies 40 patients suffering from bilateral therapy-refractory, painful (n = 20, visual analogue scale, VAS ≥ 5) or painless (n = 20, VAS = 0) sensorimotor diabetic neuropathy with clinical and/or radiologic signs of focal lower extremity nerve compression who underwent unilateral surgical nerve decompression of the common peroneal and the tibial nerve. Tissue biopsies will be analyzed to explore perineural tissue remodeling in correlation with intraoperatively measured nerve compression pressure. Effect size on symptoms including pain intensity, light touch threshold, static and moving two-point discrimination, target muscle force, and nerve conduction velocity will be quantified 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and compared (1) to the preoperative values and (2) to the contralateral lower extremity that continues non-operative management. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Targeted surgical release may alleviate mechanical strain on entrapped lower extremity nerves and thereby potentially improve pain and sensory dysfunction in a subset of patients suffering from diabetic neuropathy. This trial aims to shed light on these patients that potentially benefit from screening for lower extremity nerve entrapment, as typical symptoms of entrapment might be erroneously attributed to neuropathy only, thereby preventing adequate treatment.